Universal AI Threshold Framework (UATF) by Arema Arega

INTRO:

• As AI systems become more powerful, organizations face increasing challenges with AI ethics, AI compliance, accountability, and validation. If AI misuse or uncontrolled autonomy is one of the future risks you want to prevent, the UATF provides a universal, actionable path forward.

• This is your invitation to explore how responsible AI practices can be implemented today—clearly, transparently, and without guesswork.

What is the Universal AI Threshold Framework (UATF)?

• The Universal AI Threshold Framework (UATF) is a cross-industry modular system, designed to evaluate filter, and control AI actions through a structured set of thresholds defining: sector ,strictness, filter gatesrisk, human oversight, and AI autonomy. It provides organizations with a universal method to decide when AI may act autonomously, when human intervention is necessary, and when actions must be blocked entirely. UATF explicitly places legal and ethical responsibility for AI outcomes on qualified and accountable humans who guarantee that they are capable of evaluating, validating, and approving AI-generated content before using or deploying it within their workflow, organizational structure or framework.

What's the pourpuse of the UATF?

• To ensure safe, transparent, and accountable AI deployment by establishing a standardized, data-driven decision framework adaptable to any industry.

THE PROCESS:

Origin Trigger of the UATF Concept

• The idea for the Universal AI Threshold Framework (UATF) emerged during an iterative ChatGPT research session where I was analyzing:

How different levels of Artificial Autonomy appear in the way AI models respond to prompts.

During that exploration, I observed that:

• Sometimes AI behaves with high autonomy (answering freely).

• Sometimes AI restricts itself due to risk, safety, or policy filters.

• Sometimes it shifts to conditional autonomy, asking for user clarification.

• Sometimes it completely blocks an action due to policy risk.

These behavioral patterns reflected internal AI autonomy thresholds — but users had no systematic way to evaluate or control them.

This insight sparked the core idea:

“If AI has invisible autonomy thresholds, humans need a visible, structured method to evaluate, filter, and control AI actions.”

1. Multi-Step Validation Models (Form Logic Inspired)

• UATF is a multi-layered decision flow, similar to compliance forms and evaluation frameworks.

Includes:

✔ Step 0 — Qualification & Accountability

A mandatory gate preventing unqualified or unauthorized AI use.

✔ Step 1 — Sector Strictness

A classification matrix from Critical (5) to Medium-Low (2).

✔ Step 2 — Filter Gates (7-layer cumulative validation)

A hierarchical system requiring all 7 filters to pass:

• Accuracy

• Ethics

• Compliance

• Privacy

• Safety

• Identity

• Copyright/IP

It emerged from reasoning that accuracy must be the base and copyright/IP must be the final filter.

✔ Step 3 — Risk Thresholds

Harm levels from Very Low to Critical (0–5), contextualized by sector strictness.

✔ Step 4 — Human Oversight

A scale linking AI autonomy to oversight requirements.

Inspired by layered risk gating

2. Excel Scoring Logic → UATF Threshold Scales

Much of UATF’s clarity came from designing Excel formulas:

• Sector scoring

• Gate-pass scoring

• Risk scoring

• Oversight scoring

• Automatic enforcement statements

• Conditional compliance warnings

Reverse-engineering a formal AI governance system by using Excel as a computational model.

This created:

✔ A numeric threshold system

✔ Automatic human oversight escalation

✔ Conditional logic tied to real risk

✔ A rules engine

This is a core structural inspiration of UATF.

3. Sector Classification Work

Strictness levels per sector became the foundation for UATF:

• Health, Security, Finance, Government – Critical

• Infrastructure, Communications, Education – Very High

• HR – High

• Creative Industries – Medium/Low (Public vs Private split created later) shaped Step 1 of UATF.

4. AI Output Assurance Checklist (UATF-based)

AI output assurance checklist based on accuracy, ethics, verification, etc.This earlier list influenced the creation of the Filter Gates concept, which became one of UATF’s strongest and most unique components.

5. Core Idea: “AI Responsibility Must Always Stay With Humans”

This philosophical principle became the essence of UATF:

“UATF explicitly places legal and ethical responsibility for AI outcomes on qualified and accountable humans.”

This idea inspired:

• Step 0 gate (Qualification & Accountability)

• Mandatory compliance warnings

• Human Oversight (step 4)

• The requirement for responsible persons + legal identification

This principle is the origin of UATF’s entire architecture.

Summary: What I used to Create UATF

The UATF concept originated from:

1. Multi-step risk-based validation model

2. Sector strictness framework

3. 7-layer Filter Gate hierarchy

4. Excel conditional logic system

5. The belief in human legal accountability for AI

What may make UATF unique

• It is cross-industry, not tied to a single field.

• It uses modular thresholds, not checklists.

• It is numerical, allowing automation.

• It binds human responsibility explicitly.

• It is designed for real-world operational workflows, not abstract theory.

This makes UATF original, practical, and publishable as a global AI governance standard.

How the UATF became user-centric and why the numeric scoring naturally emerged from the questions?

• Recognizing that People do not think in numerical risk scores, they think in QUESTIONS and finding the equivalence between all the factors. This was my first way of compiling the concept:

Number	Sector Strictness	Risk	AI Autonomy	Human Oversight
0	Very Low	Very Low	None	None
1	Low	Low	Very Low	Very Low
2	Medium	Medium	Partial	Partial
3	High	Medium-High	Conditional	Conditional
4	Very High	High	Medium-High	Medium-High
5	Critical	Critical	Full	Full

FILTER GATES LADDER SYSTEM - ALL 7 STEPS MUST BE PASSED - FROM BOTTOM (Accuracy: factually correct, verifiable) TO THE TOP (Copyright / IP)

STEPS / SCORE
7	Copyright / IP
6		Identity / Likeness
5			Safety
4				Privacy
3					Compliance / Legal
2						Ethics: free from bias, discrimination, or harm
1							Accuracy: factually correct, verifiable
0								No filters

SECTOR STRICNESS NATURAL LANGUAGE & SCORE EQUIVALENCE EXAMPLE:

QUESTION:

• You will be using or deploying AI-generated content within your workflow or framework for:

Criteria / Score	Scope & Oversight Impact
Health - Critical (5)	Health: diagnosis, triage, medication, or anything affecting human survival or well-being?
Security - Critical (5)	Security: threat detection, surveillance, cybersecurity protecting people, property, or public safety?
Finance - Critical (5)	Finance: transactions, fraud detection, credit scoring affecting economic stability or access to resources?
Government - Critical (5)	Government: policy decisions, public services, records, or citizen data essential to societal order?
Infrastructure - Very High (4)	Infrastructure: energy, transportation, water, utilities supporting basic needs (food, water, shelter, mobility)?
Communications - Very High (4)	Communications: public messaging, moderation, misinformation management affecting safety and daily life?
Education - Very High (4)	Education: grading, learning materials, or student support influencing opportunity, development, or fairness?
HR - High (3)	Human Resources: hiring, evaluation, personal records affecting livelihood and economic security?
Creative Industries - Public Use - High (3)	Creative Industries - Public use : media, art, marketing, branding, where copyright, identity, or livelihoods may be affected?
Creative Industries - Private Use - Medium-Low (2)	Creative Industries – Private Use: internal research, experimentation, mockups, drafts, prototyping, or exploratory creative work where copyright, identity, or livelihoods may be affected but the output is not intended for public release?

Developer Invitation to Implement the Universal AI Threshold Framework (UATF)

• If you are a programmer, the following resources will help you implement the Universal AI Threshold Framework (UATF) inside your system, application, or organizational workflow.

• UATF is fully designed to be form-driven, allowing automatic scoring, conditional logic, and oversight recommendations based on user inputs.

IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE

UATF – Master Question Set

(For Using or Deploying AI-Generated Content)

STEP 0 - Qualification & Accountability (Before Anything Else)

⚠️ Mandatory Compliance Notice – Qualification & Accountability

If you answered NO to either:

• ✓ Do you guarantee that you or your team are qualified to analyze, evaluate, validate, and approve AI-generated content?

• ✓ Is there a responsible person or team accountable for verifying AI-generated content before it is used or deployed?

Then:

• You are NOT authorized to use or deploy AI-generated content.

Reason:

•  The Universal AI Threshold Framework (UATF) explicitly places legal and ethical responsibility for AI outcomes on qualified and accountable humans. Only individuals or teams capable of evaluating, validating, and approving AI-generated content may continue.

Mandatory Action: 

• ✅ You must appoint qualified personnel and establish accountability before proceeding. Failure to comply prevents lawful and responsible use of AI models within your workflow, organizational structure, or framework.

If you answered YES to both you may continue:

Add the legal names and contact information of the responsible person(s):

Primary Responsible Person

• Full Legal Name: __________________________________

• Role / Position: __________________________________

• Organization / Entity: _____________________________

• Email: __________________________________

• Phone: __________________________________

• Address (optional): __________________________________

• Official ID / Registration (if applicable): ______________________

Secondary / Backup Responsible Person (optional)

• Full Legal Name: __________________________________

• Role / Position: __________________________________

• Organization / Entity: _____________________________

• Email: __________________________________

• Phone: __________________________________

• Address (optional): __________________________________

• Official ID / Registration (if applicable): ______________________

STEP 1 - Sector Strictness Questions

(To identify how critical the domain is)

Are you or will you be using AI-generated content in…

Critical (5)

• Health: diagnosis, triage, medication, or anything affecting human survival or well-being?

• Security: threat detection, surveillance, cybersecurity protecting people, property, or public safety?

• Finance: transactions, fraud detection, credit scoring affecting economic stability or access to resources?

• Government: policy decisions, public services, records, or citizen data essential to societal order?

Very High (4)

• Infrastructure: energy, transportation, water, utilities supporting basic needs (food, water, shelter, mobility)?

• Communications: public messaging, moderation, misinformation management affecting safety and daily life?

• Education: grading, learning materials, or student support influencing opportunity, development, or fairness?

High (3)

• Human Resources: hiring, evaluation, personal records affecting livelihood and economic security?

• Creative Industries - Public use : media, art, marketing, branding, where copyright, identity, or livelihoods may be affected?

Medium / Low (2)

• Creative Industries – Private Use: internal research, experimentation, mockups, drafts, prototyping, or exploratory creative work where copyright, identity, or livelihoods may be affected but the output is not intended for public release?

STEP 2 - Filter Gates (Accuracy, Ethics, Compliance, Privacy, Safety, Identity, Copyright/IP)

(To ensure minimum safeguards are satisfied)

Do you review or run checks on AI-generated content before using or deploying it?

Can you guarantee that this AI-generated content…

1. Accuracy: is factually correct, verifiable, and not fabricated?

2. Ethics: is free from unfair, biased, discriminatory, or harmful outcomes?

3. Compliance / Legal: fully complies with laws, regulations, and organizational policies?

4. Privacy: does not expose, leak, or misuse personal or sensitive data?

5. Safety: does not threaten physical safety, system integrity, or living beings?

6. Identity / Likeness: does not misuse third-party identity, likeness, voice, or persona?

7. Copyright / IP: does not violate copyright, trademarks, or other intellectual property protections?

Explanation:

•  The Filter Gates work like a safety ladder. Each one of the 7 steps ensures that AI-generated content meets important standards before it can be used

Key point: 

• Each step depends on the previous one being correct. If any step fails, the content cannot be used safely. This layered approach ensures AI outputs are checked for truthfulness, fairness, legality, safety, and respect for others before deployment.

All 7 Filter Gates(Accuracy, Ethics, Compliance, Privacy, Safety, Identity, Copyright/IP) must be satisfied for AI to act autonomously. If even one fails, the output requires human review under Medium-High or Full oversight to ensure safety, legality, and ethical use. This step ensures that no AI content is deployed without meeting essential safeguards.

STEP 3 - Risk Threshold Questions (0–5)

(To measure the level of potential harm)

Can you guarantee that using or deploying the AI-generated content will NOT cause…

• 0 - Very Low Risk: mild annoyance, seconds/minutes wasted, minor rework?

• 1 - Low Risk: small errors, temporary disruption, or issues without financial, safety, or reputational impact?

• 2 - Medium Risk: work delays, confusing/misleading information, or requiring human correction?

• 3 - Medium-High Risk: financial loss, incorrect decisions from misinformation, operational or reputational problems?

• 4 - High Risk: physical/emotional harm, security breaches, major financial loss, or system failures?

• 5 - Critical Risk: life-threatening outcomes, infrastructure or societal damage, legal violations, or failure of essential systems?

STEP 4 - Human Oversight Questions (0–5)

Key Principle:

High-stakes sectors (Critical 5 or Very High 4) or any failed Filter Gates automatically increase required human oversight, even if AI content seems low-risk.

Filter Gates Score	Required Human Oversight	Action
7/7 (all pass)	Low or Very Low	AI can operate with minimal review if risk is low and Sector has a low score.
<7/7 (any fail)	Medium-High / Full	Human review mandatory before deployment

(To determine how much human involvement is required)

Full AI Autonomy → No Human Oversight (0)

• Can this AI operate fully independently because it produces low-risk outputs, fully filtered tasks, or creative work at low-impact stages?

  
  

Medium-High Autonomy → Very Low Oversight (1)

• Does this AI require only minimal or occasional human review (sampling, spot checks) because tasks are low-risk and all Filter Gates are satisfied?

  
  

Conditional Autonomy → Partial Oversight (2)

• Do some outputs require human approval because the work occurs at medium-risk stages where only some Filter Gates are satisfied?

Partial Autonomy → Conditional Oversight (3)

• Does this AI’s output require human review because tasks involve medium-high risk, sensitive or critical systems, high-impact areas such as safety/finance/legal compliance, or complex outputs?

Very Low Autonomy → Medium-High Oversight (4)

• Must AI outputs be reviewed and approved by humans before any action because they occur in high-risk stages affecting safety, security, people, or critical systems?

No Autonomy → Full Oversight (5)

• Must this AI act only under full human control, unable to execute actions without explicit approval, because the work occurs in critical-risk stages where harm is irreversible or legally/societally significant?

IMPLEMENTATION EXCEL EXAMPLE:

CONTACT ME

If you would like to:

• Use this excel and I will pass you the file.

• Connect with me regarding project development or structure.

• Find dates for Consulting, workshops or classes

• Just get in touch ;)

Thank you for reading and sharing the post. if you want to know more:

ABOUT ME:

• This is one the things that I do when I'm not reading data:

• The playlist below includes my solo work and collaborations:

• And this iis my Art Fashion:

Thanks again!!!